A whistleblower finally stepped forward.
That’s bad news for the corporate media.
And now someone just showed Donald Trump the proof about what really happened in the 2020 election.
As Conservative Revival reports:
After Donald Trump won the 2016 election, Democrats and their allies in the corporate media blame Trump’s win on his ability to use social media to speak directly to Americans.
The left decided that to beat Trump, Democrats need to monopolize what information flowed to voters.
Corporate media outlets and Big Tech settled on a strategy of calling any point of view that disagreed with the Democrat Party narrative on any given policy issue “misinformation” and the social media censors banned that speech from the internet.
One of biggest players in the tech cabal controlling what information Americans were allowed to see or read online was Google.
Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies – who co-authored the book“Google Leaks: A Whistleblower’s Exposé of Big Tech Censorship” – explained to the Epoch Times how Google manipulated its search engine algorithm to ensure negative news from corporate media ended up at the top of search results and also bury conservative media pieces that questioned the liberal presses misinformation and conspiracy theory.
Vorhies explained this process of rewriting Google’s search algorithm to favor anti-Trump stories began in the early days of the Russian collusion hoax.
“This is called realtime, hive-mind scoring,” Vorhies explained. “They literally built it, they re-wrote it according to the fight that Trump was having with Comey.”
Vorhies claimed Google undertook this process at a cost to its business as search engine competitors experienced some growth as users hunted around for alternatives that did not just promote the corporate media anti-Trump narrative.
“The way that they allowed the mainstream media to structure their stories so they could remain at the top of their search index, their news index,” Vorhies continued.
Vorhies added that the new algorithm created a self-fulfilling prophecy where Google ranked sites based on what the corporate media and the increasingly left-wing Wikipedia wrote about an outlet.
“They base the score off of what the mainstream media says, and also what Wikipedia says. Now the problem with Wikipedia is that they’ve gone from using primary sources to using secondary sources that describe the primary sources,” Vorhies added.
Vorhies warned that when corporate media outlets or Wikipedia accused a conservative media outlet of publishing “misinformation” or conspiracy theories that conservative media entity needed to immediately fight for a retraction or else Google would bury the site in search results.
“So when you get a negative story, your website will likely face a [PageRank] penalty within the next 3-6 months. So it’s really important for businesses out there if they get hit, if they get slandered, to go force a retraction because if they don’t it’s going to end up on Wikipedia and then this defamation-laundering engine known as Wikipedia will cause their search ranking engine on Google to go down,” Vorhies stated.
In many ways the left slanted the 2020 election against Donald Trump.
Big Tech’s censorship and careful curating the political conversation so Americans were more likely to discover negative stories about Donald Trump on Google searches played a major role in rigging the election in Joe Biden’s favor.