Alvin Bragg found himself under investigation.
Bragg’s decision to charge Donald Trump continues to backfire.
Republicans found the one witness that could bring down Alvin Bragg.
As American Patriot Daily reports:
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan subpoenaed former New York County Special Assistant District Attorney Mark Pomerantz for testimony about the witch hunt against Donald Trump.
Pomerantz resigned after former Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. refused to indict Trump on a cockamamie financial fraud charge after realizing there was no evidence Trump committed a crime.
Pomerantz then published “People vs. Donald Trump,” where Pomerantz took the unprecedented step of declaring Trump guilty of multiple crimes without Trump facing any charges.
Chairman Jordan and others suspect that Pomerantz’s resignation and book played a role in pressuring current Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg into charging Trump with nonexistent crimes.
Bragg rejected an invitation to sit for a voluntary interview so Jordan subpoenaed Pomerantz for testimony about the political bias and anti-Trump crusade inside the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
Facing the prospect of Pomerantz spilling his dirty secrets about the scheme to get Trump in open court, Bragg filed a junk lawsuit against Chairman Jordan seeking to block Pomerantz’s testimony.
Bragg’s lawsuit claimed the subpoena to Pomerantz was “in response to an unprecedently brazen and unconstitutional attack by members of Congress on an ongoing New York State criminal prosecution and investigation of former President Donald J. Trump.”
District Attorney Bragg baselessly argued that Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee lacked the authority to investigate abuses of power in a district attorney’s office that received federal funds and that could be interfering in the 2024 election.
“Chairman Jordan’s subpoena is an unconstitutional attempt to undermine an ongoing New York felony criminal prosecution and investigation,” Bragg added. “As our complaint details, this is an unprecedented, illegitimate interference by Congress that lacks any legal merit and defies basic principles of federalism.”
Conservatives noted that Bragg never sued to stop Pomerantz from publishing this account of the investigation into Trump or going on a whirlwind media tour to try and sell his book so therefore Bragg should have no grounds to stop Pomerantz from testifying.
Jordan responded on social media by blasting Bragg as a hack that weaponized the judicial system to bring phony charges against the leader of the opposing political party and then tried to hide behind the courts to spare himself accountability for his actions.
“First, they indict a president for no crime.” Jordan continued, “Then, they sue to block congressional oversight when we ask questions about the federal funds they say they used to do it.”
Alvin Bragg took the unprecedented step of indicting a former president and frontrunner for the opposing party’s presidential nomination.
Critics contend Bragg knows his investigation is a politically motivated sham which is why he is desperate to stop Pomerantz from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee.